• Uniting the Community: Reviving #ti

    by  • January 20, 2010. 9:18 pm • General • 17 Comments

    Sum­mary: The TI cal­cu­la­tor com­mu­nity is frac­tured and unco­or­di­nated. Cod­ing and hack­ing tal­ent is still plen­ti­ful, and enthu­si­asm is strong, yet no cen­tral meet­ing area and sound­ing board exists for pro­gram­mers and com­mu­nity mem­bers to coop­er­ate on projects, dis­cuss ideas, and share infor­ma­tion. We pro­pose begin­ning #ti once more as a neu­tral, reli­able, and safe calculator-only dis­cus­sion channel.

    Back­ground: Inter­net Relay Chat (IRC) has a strong tra­di­tion within the TI-calculator com­mu­nity, and mul­ti­ple chan­nels exist which help serve the needs of com­mu­nity mem­bers. How­ever, these chan­nels are spread apart, poorly adver­tised, and the user bases gen­er­ally does not mix due to past grudges and mis­in­for­ma­tion spread about “rival” chan­nels. The fol­low­ing is a par­tial list of cur­rently known calculator-oriented channels:

    • #ceme­tech (EFnet): The home chan­nel of Ceme­tech, this chan­nel focuses around the activ­i­ties of the site and its asso­ci­ated pro­gram­mers, and includes a “SAX” bridge which links up chats from var­i­ous com­mu­nity sites into one place. Aver­ages around 15–16 active users con­nected at any one time, as well as 4–6 addi­tional ones through the “SAX” bridge. Ceme­tech focuses on mul­ti­ple foci, one of which is calculators.
    • #omn­imaga (EFnet): #omn­imaga is the pri­mary chan­nel of the web­site under the same name. As with #ceme­tech, this chan­nel is closely linked with the forum asso­ci­ated with the web­site. #omn­imaga aver­ages around 15–20 users.
    • #tcpa (EFnet): The “old­est” of the cur­rently active IRC chan­nels, #tcpa aver­ages 50–60 con­nected users at any one point. It is, how­ever, not asso­ci­ated with any pro­gram­ming group or web­site. Addi­tion­ally, while the chan­nel does con­tain cal­cu­la­tors users, the dis­cus­sion is technology-oriented with a focus on calculators.

    Pro­posal: The chan­nel #ti has a long his­tory of being a com­mu­nity chan­nel. We sug­gest that instead of attempt­ing to rein­vent the already-healthy #tcpa, that we use #ti as a pri­mary con­tact point for pro­gram­mers and those seek­ing assistance.The chan­nel would be calculator-only, and all off-topic dis­cus­sion will be referred to #tcpa.

    Through this dual-channel sys­tem, we will be able to not only keep a chan­nel for gen­eral dis­cus­sion of mutual inter­ests in #tcpa, but also pro­vide an excel­lent expe­ri­ence for both new-users and expe­ri­enced pro­gram­mers alike in #ti.

    While past attempts to cre­ate calculator-only chan­nels have failed, we attribute that no adver­tis­ing out­side of #tcpa, and a gen­eral lack of com­mu­nity coop­er­a­tion. Through effec­tive lead­er­ship ensur­ing a safe and on-topic envi­ron­ment, encour­age­ment of all pro­gram­mers and users in a pos­i­tive man­ner, and cre­at­ing a place to share ideas, we believe that #ti can unite the com­mu­nity, while still keep­ing the dis­tinc­tive site-oriented chan­nels which are still active today.

    Users seek­ing assis­tance would be directed to #ti in all sit­u­a­tions, and through coop­er­a­tion amongst cur­rent com­mu­nity lead­ers and forum mod­er­a­tors, we can make this chan­nel suc­cess­ful once again.

    We intend not to replace cur­rent chan­nels, but to sup­ple­ment them in a con­struc­tive fash­ion, where devel­op­ment and help can take place above par­ti­san bickering.

    Ques­tions, con­cerns, or sug­ges­tions are wel­come. Please post a com­ment below or e-mail me: nikkys@ticalc.org

    About

    I'm Nikky, and I'm fairly awesome.

    http://nykida.net

    17 Responses to Uniting the Community: Reviving #ti

    1. Jon Sturm
      January 20, 2010. 2:15 pm at 2:15 pm

      Agreed on the bril­liant idea Nikky, though you already knew that.

    2. Nathan Ladwig(Netham45)
      January 20, 2010. 9:26 pm at 9:26 pm

      I approve.

    3. January 20, 2010. 9:30 pm at 9:30 pm

      I think this could work, as long as we can get Kevin onboard. Kerm won’t be a problem.

    4. January 20, 2010. 9:33 pm at 9:33 pm

      One of the ideas we would con­sider is grant­ing com­mu­nity lead­ers mod­er­a­tor rights that would allow them to man­age the chan­nel in a coop­er­a­tive man­ner through mutu­ally agreed rules. Noth­ing exces­sive, of course, but still allow all groups and sites have their voice heard.

    5. January 21, 2010. 7:41 am at 7:41 am

      This could work if every­one who par­tic­i­pates in the chan­nel agrees to behave, and that mod­er­a­tors selected ensures every kind of calc dis­cus­sion (as long as appro­pri­ate) is wel­come. That said, I may show up in there every now and then, as long as no trou­ble is insti­gated. Some peo­ple may not agree with me or like me, but remem­ber that I still devoted almost a decade of my life, peak­ing at 70 hours a week in 2002-03, in the TI community.

      While I do not plan to change #omn­imaga sta­tus as a calc game, com­puter and music chan­nel, I will post a news arti­cle adver­tis­ing the #ti chan­nel, men­tion­ning its goals, on my web­site soon.

    6. January 21, 2010. 7:41 am at 7:41 am

      Freen­ode IRC has a low-profile, 3 year old chan­nel called
      #Mod­ern­Calcs which was cre­ated in the hopes that calc-enthusiasts
      could come together on Freen­ode to dis­cuss any aspect of
      Mod­ern Graphing/Programmable Calculators!

      Every level of Calc use is wel­comed from absolute begin­ner to
      high-end assem­bly programming.

      Unfor­tu­nately #Mod­ern­Calcs has never really had much response,
      but that has not stopped us from hav­ing 3 years on Freenode.

      So please join us and cre­ate yet another niche for Cal­cu­la­tor enthu­si­asts. TI89, HP50G, most welcomed.

      //Rich/

      01−21−10 14:45z

    7. Silver Shadow (aka ZagorNBK)
      January 21, 2010. 8:58 am at 8:58 am

      Great idea! But I feel that we could get on fur­ther with this con­cept: add a spe­cial box on ticalc.org (just below the ban­ner for exam­ple) where you could instantly con­nect to the IRC. I feel that this way, more of the com­mu­nity will par­tic­i­pate in it…

      • January 22, 2010. 6:09 pm at 6:09 pm

        I am plan­ning on announc­ing this on ticalc at some point, and see­ing if we could make this com­mu­nity help a lit­tle eas­ier to find.

        • January 22, 2010. 10:29 pm at 10:29 pm

          Ticalc.org IRC page pro­motes both #tcpa and #calcs at the moment. I guess it might be good to add #ti as “calc-only dis­cus­sion” to that list or sim­ply replace #calcs, which is not used much IIRC.

          Also remove the Phar­macy web­site link right above.

    8. January 21, 2010. 9:24 am at 9:24 am

      I front­paged an edited ver­sion of nikky’s announce­ment at Ceme­tech. This seems like a good idea to me.

    9. January 21, 2010. 11:15 am at 11:15 am

      That’s not a bad idea, not a bad idea at all

    10. Zach Redmon (Zachary940)
      January 21, 2010. 12:54 pm at 12:54 pm

      I think it is a great idea

    11. Riley Ellis (simplethinker/snjwffl)
      January 22, 2010. 5:00 am at 5:00 am

      This sounds like a promis­ing idea. Given how the com­mu­nity came together dur­ing the key fac­tor­ing, and the rel­a­tive low in inter-channel dis­putes this might be an oppor­tune time to try.

      I think the fact that there will be only cal­cu­la­tor dis­cus­sion will help tremen­dously, since it’s the one thing most every­one has an inter­est in.

      I do have one sug­ges­tion though: You’re propos­ing that all cal­cu­la­tor dis­cus­sion should be referred to #ti. While cre­at­ing a cen­tral hub will help unify the com­mu­nity con­sid­er­ably, some reci­procity is needed too, espe­cially if #ti is not to sup­plant exist­ing chan­nels. There are three pri­mary rea­sons for this:
      1) If all goes as planned, #ti will be active and have a lot of users. Ques­tions could be missed dur­ing heavy con­ver­sa­tion, or even have so many dif­fer­ent peo­ple answer­ing a ques­tion (prob­a­bly with many dif­fer­ent sug­ges­tions) it could over­whelm a per­son.
      2) Some ques­tions are bet­ter suited when asked of other people/channels (con­sider that #omn­imaga, #ceme­tech and #tcpa have very dif­fer­ent con­ver­sa­tions, even when dis­cussing cal­cu­la­tors).
      3) Not *every­one* in the IRC com­mu­nity will use #ti, and so there can be ques­tions best answered by some­one out­side of #ti.

      • January 22, 2010. 6:11 pm at 6:11 pm

        I agree, the key fac­tor­ing and other such efforts really proved that the com­mu­nity is still active.

        I wasn’t plan­ning on mak­ing it the *only* cal­cu­la­tor chan­nel, but sim­ply one where the only focus is cal­cu­la­tors. So we know when we’re send­ing some­one some­where, they’ll get assis­tance with­out hav­ing to wade through offtopic discussion.

    12. January 22, 2010. 2:04 pm at 2:04 pm

      Well, one thing to con­sider is that #omn­imaga doesn’t do 68K and I don’t think #ceme­tech does, either. When peo­ple came to ask us such ques­tions before, unless Lionel Debroux was active we had to redi­rect these peo­ple to #tcpa. Plus #tcpa had a lot of TI-89 data in MATH.

      • January 22, 2010. 2:08 pm at 2:08 pm

        A *lot* of data in MATH. :)

        I agree with the gen­eral lack of 68K sup­port. Any ideas to con­nect with that com­mu­nity would be appreciated.

        • January 22, 2010. 5:15 pm at 5:15 pm

          The chan­nel would prob­a­bly need to be adver­tised on sites like yAronet and TI-BANK. How­ever on TI-BANK they aren’t big fans of IRC it seems. The other solu­tion would be the TICT board and #TIGCC chan­nel, if any­one else than Kevin Kofler can still access it.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *